Comments on: Snapplr 1.0 https://briksoftware.com/blog/archives/107 Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:56:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7 By: Alejandro https://briksoftware.com/blog/archives/107/comment-page-1#comment-16291 Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:01:58 +0000 https://briksoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-16291 I wish you could release a FTP upload feature soon 😉

]]>
By: Karsten https://briksoftware.com/blog/archives/107/comment-page-1#comment-16157 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:18:07 +0000 https://briksoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-16157 we are still working on it. Snapplr 1.1 proves to be a bit bigger than expected.

]]>
By: Kristoffer https://briksoftware.com/blog/archives/107/comment-page-1#comment-16153 Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:07:02 +0000 https://briksoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-16153 One year later, any plans for FTP support soon? 😛

]]>
By: Michele https://briksoftware.com/blog/archives/107/comment-page-1#comment-16108 Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:37:27 +0000 https://briksoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-16108 Yes, annotation is a planned feature, but we want to make it extraordinary, so it will take some time 😀

]]>
By: Rich https://briksoftware.com/blog/archives/107/comment-page-1#comment-16107 Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:00:34 +0000 https://briksoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-16107 Tried the demo. Very nice app. Will annotation be a part os snapplr any time soon?

WIth text/arrow/highlight/outline box (like snagit on the windows side) snapplr would warrant purchase consideration by me. Not being able to annotate the screenshots (for me) is a stopper.

Beautiful website for the product and I love how the product itself is seamless with OSX. Very mac-like! well done!

Rich

]]>
By: Michele https://briksoftware.com/blog/archives/107/comment-page-1#comment-16105 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:36:26 +0000 https://briksoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-16105 http://snapplr.com, will post it again 😀

]]>
By: Jeff Johnson https://briksoftware.com/blog/archives/107/comment-page-1#comment-16104 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:42:11 +0000 https://briksoftware.com/blog/?p=107#comment-16104 Link? 🙂

]]>